Banks Urge RBI to Swap Rupee Hedge Deposit for Flat Fee

Indian lenders have asked the Reserve Bank to ease new rupee-defence measures by replacing a 20% cash deposit mandate with a simpler flat charge. They argue the current rule traps liquidity and creates tracking loopholes.

RBI India 20% Saving
Ai Generated : Nano Banana

The short version

  • Banks propose replacing the 20% cash deposit with a flat charge to avoid tying up treasury liquidity.
  • Lenders seek removal of the $2 million threshold to prevent companies from splitting transactions.
  • Citi economists estimate the measure could absorb ₹60,000 crore to ₹70,000 crore in liquidity.
  • The rupee jumped 1% on Monday following the regulatory announcement.
  • Banks will pass the hedging costs on to clients.

Why it matters: Clarifying these mechanics is vital for market stability as the rupee faces pressure from oil prices and capital outflows.

On this page
  1. The short version
  2. Liquidity impact and market reaction
  3. Sources and further reading
  4. Frequently asked questions

Indian lenders have asked the Reserve Bank to ease new rupee-defence measures by replacing a 20% cash deposit mandate with a simpler flat charge.

The request comes as banks warn the current threshold-based rule ties up critical treasury liquidity and may encourage companies to split transactions to avoid compliance. Clarifying these mechanics is vital for market stability as the rupee faces pressure from oil prices and capital outflows.

Banks have asked the Reserve Bank of India to relax a key measure introduced over the weekend to bolster the rupee. They also requested the removal of the threshold triggering the rule, four people familiar with the discussions said.

Lenders approached the central bank through a forex industry body. They sought to eliminate a mandate requiring banks to park 20% of the value of FX derivatives used for current-account hedging as cash with the RBI.

The RBI announced its measures on Saturday. The steps intend to reduce corporate appetite for forward dollars, which has strained the rupee. Steep oil prices and capital outflows have driven the currency lower.

Regulatory moves prompted the rupee to rise 1% on Monday. It opened 80 paise higher amid intervention by the RBI. Year-to-date, the currency has fallen more than 6 per cent due to capital outflows and oil prices.

"Instead of that (the 20% reserve) just directly imposing a higher charge, say in paisa terms, removes a lot of friction"

unnamed bankerbanker who attended a meeting of the Foreign Exchange Dealers' Association of India on Sunday

Banks proposed that the RBI substitute the 20% deposit rule with a flat fee for firms hedging current-account exposures via forward dollar buys or other derivatives. Lenders argue this change would increase hedging costs without locking up rupee liquidity in treasury operations.

Banks also asked to remove the $2 million threshold activating the deposit requirement. They warned this limit might prompt firms to divide hedges into smaller tranches, making such practices hard to monitor since bankers may not question clients booking multiple small transactions, they said.

What we know

  • Banks urge RBI to ease measures and scrap the threshold for the 20% deposit.
  • Banks propose a flat charge to raise costs without tying up rupee liquidity.
  • Lenders seek removal of the $2 million threshold to prevent hedge splitting.

Still unclear

  • Whether the RBI will ease the 20% cash deposit mandate or scrap the threshold.
  • Whether the deposit requirement applies to hedges against interest payments on foreign-currency loans.
  • The RBI's official response to the banks' proposals.

A banker who attended Sunday's Foreign Exchange Dealers' Association of India meeting said banks will pass costs to clients. Lenders have asked if the 20% deposit rule applies to hedges covering interest payments on foreign-currency loans.

Lenders are seeking clarity on whether interest payments will be exempted, as the rules do not cover hedging for principal repayments on overseas loans. The RBI's measures also included redirecting oil companies' dollar demand away from the spot market.

An email requesting comment drew no immediate response from the RBI.

Liquidity impact and market reaction

  • ₹60,000 crore to ₹70,000 crore$6.27 billion to $7.31 billionEstimated liquidity absorption

Source: Citi economists

Citi economists estimate that liquidity absorption will range from ₹60,000 crore to ₹70,000 crore, or $6.27 billion to $7.31 billion, even if importer hedging drops significantly.

Rupee performance comparison

Monday reaction

Immediate impact

+1%

  • Rupee jumped 1%
  • Appreciated 80 paise at open

Year-to-date

Longer trend

-6%

  • Down over 6 per cent
  • Rocked by oil prices and outflows

Sources and further reading

  1. Banks seek RBI relief, clarity on India's latest rupee-defence measures (opens in a new tab) Business Standard
  2. Banks seek RBI relief, clarity on India's latest rupee-defence measures (opens in a new tab) The Hindu BusinessLine
  3. Banks seek RBI relief, clarity on India's latest rupee-defence measures: Report (opens in a new tab) The Economic Times

This article was prepared by the GlobePrism editorial team from the public reporting linked above. How we report

Frequently asked questions

What are banks asking the RBI to change?

Banks want the RBI to replace the 20% cash deposit mandate with a flat charge and remove the $2 million threshold.

Why do banks oppose the 20% deposit rule?

Lenders argue the rule ties up critical treasury liquidity and creates loopholes where companies can split transactions to avoid compliance.

How much liquidity could the measure absorb?

Citi economists estimate that about ₹60,000 crore to ₹70,000 crore ($6.27 billion to $7.31 billion) of liquidity could be absorbed.

Will clients bear the cost of the new measures?

Yes, banks will be passing on the cost to clients, according to a banker who attended a recent industry meeting.

Does the deposit requirement apply to interest payments on foreign loans?

Lenders have sought clarity on this point, as the rules currently do not cover hedging related to principal repayments for overseas loans.